0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹¾îÆÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ (clinical decision making) Ãà¾àµµ±¸ÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º °ËÁ¤

Validity of Korean Version of Clinical Decision Making Short Form Scale

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 26±Ç 4È£ p.403 ~ 412
KMID : 0367020140260040403
±è¸í¼ö ( Kim Myoung-Soo ) - ºÎ°æ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Á¤Çö°æ ( Jung Hyun-Kyeong ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø °£È£ÇàÁ¤±³À°ÆÀ

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of shortened Nursing Decision-Making Instrument developed by Lauri & Salantera?(2002).

Methods: The subjects were 247 nurses working in eight hospitals of Korea. Data were collected by questionnaires from June to July, 2012 and were analyzed by Principal Component Analysis for construct validity and Cronbach"s ¥á coefficient for reliability.

Results: Factor loadings of the four subscales ranged from .32 to .73. The explained variance from the four factors was 48.54% of the total variance. The factors were named "implementation of plan, monitoring and evaluation", "plans of action", "data collection", and "data processing and identification". The first factor consisted of 6 items which explained 13.21% of the total variance and the second factor contained 8 items. The Cronbach"s ¥á coefficients of the four subscales were from .64 to .81.

Conclusion: The Korean version of the shortened Nursing Decision-Making Instrument has satisfactory construct validity and reliability. However, that the scores of the analytic items weren"t reversed unlike the analysis method of the original tools is the biggest limitation of this study. In addition, based on the fact that there were several discrepancies for item interpretation of Korean comparing to the findings of the instrument development study, repetitive researches would be suggested.
KeyWords
ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤, Ÿ´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ, ¿äÀκм®
Decision making, Reliability and validity, Factor analysis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed